Kamal
Nath claims diplomatic immunity in 1984 riots case in US
Friday July 01, 2011 12:11:14 PM,
Arun Kumar, IANS
|
Washington:
Indian Urban Development Minister Kamal Nath has claimed
diplomatic immunity and lack of service of summons before a US
court in a case over his alleged role in the November 1984
anti-Sikh riots.
In response to summons issued by Judge Robert W. Sweet of the US
Federal Court for the Southern District of New York, Kamal Nath
claimed diplomatic immunity stating that he was on a special
mission as a government official on his numerous travels to New
York.
He has also claimed sovereign immunity under common law; and
immunity under Foreign Sovereign Immunity Act (FSIA) of the US in
the case filed by Sikhs For Justice (SFJ), a US based human rights
advocacy group, and some victims of the 1984 riots.
Requesting the court to dismiss the law suit, Kamal Nath filed a
sworn affidavit that during his April 2010 visit to New York, no
one ever served him with the summons and complaint.
Gurpatwant Singh Pannun, SFJ legal advisor, suggested that Kamal
Nath's June 24 affidavit "clearly and blatantly contradicts his
earlier statements".
On April 6, Kamal Nath publicly acknowledged receiving the
summons, he said.
According to Pannun, he then stated: "A piece of paper was given
to me. I will have to see what the piece of paper is all about."
"I really have no clue about it. I don't have a basis and I don't
know the authenticity. I don't know the validity. It was for the
first time that I saw it," he was quoted as saying.
Sweet had March 1 issued summons to Nath and the Congress party in
the case accusing them of "conspiring, aiding, abetting and
carrying out organised attacks on Sikh population of India in
November 1984", according to Pannun.
(Arun Kumar can
be contacted at arun.kumar@ians.in)
|
|
|
|
|
Home |
Top of the Page |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|