New Delhi: The Supreme Court of India while hearing a petition on blockade of roads becuase of anti-CAA/NRC/NPR protest at Shaheen Bagh said that right to protest is a fundamental right.
When Solicitor General Tushar Mehta contended before the court that the protesters can't continue blocking roads on grounds of not getting an alternative site, the court replied: "It is a fundamental right of the people to protest and people can protest."
The SC bench headed by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul and Justice K.M. Joseph, citing replication of protests involving blocking of public roads, said: "We are concerned as to what will happen if people start hitting the streets and blocking the roads while protesting."
When Mehta contended that the message that every institution has been kneeling and praying to the protesters should not go out, Justice Joseph queried Mehta, "Then why did the Centre not take steps before this matter was brought before the top court. Why didn't you act in the last 68 days?"
"For some reasons, you have not gone there. If nothing works out, we will leave it to you," the bench told Mehta, who insisted that talks were held with welfare and market associations to lift restrictions on the road.
The observation from the apex court came while hearing the petitions filed by advocate Amit Sahni and BJP leader Nand Kishore Garg, seeking the removal of the protesters to end the road blockade.
The top court however appointed three interlocutors led by senior advocate Sanjay Hegde to talk to the Shaheen Bagh protesters regarding shifting the protest site and file a report in the court. Senior advocate Sadhna Ramachandran and former chief information commissioner Wajahat Habibullah are the other two interlocutors.
The court suggested that Delhi Police may offer an alternative site to the protesters at Shaheen Bagh. The court also said the protesters are aggrieved by a particular legislation (Citizenship Amendment Act). The challenge to this Act is pending before the top court.
"They may get favourable or unfavourable judgement... Our intrinsic concern is if everybody starts blocking roads or public areas, the question is where to protest. It should not happen on the streets. If another section occupies another road, that is the issue," the court observed.
The court also observed that the authorities should favourably consider this aspect of the right to protest. The top court put the petitions seeking direction to Delhi Police to remove the road blockade at Shaheen Bagh for further consideration on February 24.
For all the latest News, Opinions and Views, download ummid.com App.
Select Language To Read in Urdu, Hindi, Marathi or Arabic.
Protest against CAA, Police brutality across Tamil Nadu
Also Read
Nationwide NRC BJP's agenda, but no govt decision as yet: Amit Shah
Akal Takht supports Muslims protesting against CAA-NRC
Shaheen Bagh has Surprise Gift, Love Song for Modi on Valentine's Day
Lawyers cite Greta Thunberg, children being called Pakistanis in SC on Shaheen Bagh infant's death
'We must keep in mind...': Bombay HC while allowing protest against CAA
Stop NPR until there's clarity on NRC: Ex-IAS officer to PM Modi
"Till Now...": Modi govt issues clarification on NRC, NPR in Parliament
MIT researchers create system that can update Wikipedia articles automatically
BJP deserves to lose Delhi
People from all sections of the society rallied behind AAP: Delhi Exit Polls
Watch: Amit Shah's speeches that fuelled anti-CAA protests across India
'When your ancesters were licking boots of British': Awhad tears into BJP govt over CAA
Are Adivasis Hindus?
2020 Poll Results: New Delhi Assembly to have 05 Muslim MLAs
After hours of tense moments, Manish Sisodia pulls off a thriller