| 
               
              Once again Prime Minister Manmohan 
              Singh asserted recently, while answering a journalist, that the 
              world was large enough to accommodate the growth ambitions of both 
              India and China. In a similar vein but speaking specifically about 
              Africa, a senior official in India's Ministry of External Affairs 
              observed, at a recent seminar in Delhi, that India-Africa 
              partnership "stands on its own", thereby denying indirectly that 
              China had anything to do with it. Characterising it as "an old 
              relationship, very mature and productive", he aptly remarked that 
              it "has worked for us and for them (i.e., Africans)". 
               
              Thanks to geographical proximity, age-old knowledge of sea winds 
              that determined travel by dhows across the Indian Ocean, and a 
              long history of trade and cultural exchanges, India's ties with 
              the eastern coast of Africa had flourished for long. Shared 
              experience of colonialism deepened this affinity, reinforced by 
              large-scale migration of Indians to eastern and southern Africa. 
              In the struggle against colonialism and apartheid, India and 
              Africa were comrades-in-arms. Throughout this interaction going 
              back to centuries, China did not exist as a factor. No wonder 
              Jawaharlal Nehru, India's first prime minister, went around 
              'introducing' then Chinese premier Zhou Enlai to African leaders 
              at the Bandung Conference in 1955. However, the situation has 
              since changed dramatically, especially in the past decade. 
               
              Regardless of how New Delhi projects it, the fact remains that 
              many experts and media representatives in Western countries as 
              well as in Africa, India and China have been commenting frequently 
              on China-Africa relations and India-Africa relations, adopting a 
              comparative approach in evaluating their growth and the challenges 
              they face in the future. Several key points emerge from their 
              analyses. 
               
              First, China began a comprehensive, institutionalised approach to 
              dealing with Africa at the continental level through its Forum on 
              China-Africa Cooperation (FOCAC) which has become an influential 
              force since inception in October 2000. India adopted a modified 
              approach which emanated from its consultations with the 54-nation 
              African Union (AU); instead of inviting all member-states of AU, 
              it invited only a handful of them stressing their representative 
              character, to the first India-Africa Forum Summit held in 2008. 
              Programmes of cooperation which emerged from the two processes 
              have been considerably similar. 
               
              Secondly, both China and India need Africa's support for their 
              political goals and agenda in world affairs. Both have also been 
              helping Africa to secure a greater say in international governance 
              institutions. Both support Africa in improving its performance to 
              achieve its Millennium Development Goals. Development models of 
              India and China as well as their diplomatic styles have been under 
              constant debate and scrutiny among African countries. 
               
              Thirdly, when it comes to 'political visibility', China has been 
              running far ahead of India, with its programme of regular and 
              frequent visits by its president, prime minister, foreign minister 
              and other dignitaries to all regions of Africa - west, east, north 
              and south. Indians ministers do visit African countries, but 
              visits at the VVIP level are still very few. Similarly, visits by 
              African leaders to China are far larger in number than those to 
              India. Apparently this 'visibility deficit' has been factored in 
              by New Delhi recently, with the result that an increased number of 
              high-level visits from Africa to India have taken place in 2010. 
               
              Fourthly, economic relations offer a mixed picture. As regards 
              trade, financial aid, project assistance, record of winning energy 
              and mining assets and participation in infrastructure development, 
              China has achieved much greater success. India's investment 
              presence, however, is bigger. India Inc. has focused attention on 
              its core strengths, namely, ICT, small industry, pharmaceutical, 
              automobile and banking sectors as well as assistance for human 
              resource development. But capacity building is not India's 
              monopoly; China too has been helping Africa considerably. 
               
              Finally, India's diaspora in Africa is much larger and a more 
              integrated element in Africa's social landscape than Chinese 
              communities present in a few countries, especially where new 
              projects have brought a sizable number of Chinese workers. 
              Potential for the Indian diaspora to contribute to the growth of 
              India-Africa relations is getting realized, but not optimally yet. 
               
              A senior European diplomat based in Delhi told me recently: "There 
              is no competition between China and India because the latter is 
              not there!" It is an erroneous view, not borne by facts. On the 
              other hand, to argue that the China factor is irrelevant to 
              India's contemporary approach to Africa too is questionable. 
               
              Instead of denying the unfolding competition with China, India 
              could pursue a better option, namely, to acknowledge it 
              realistically, monitor the evolution and implementation of China's 
              Africa policy closely, and deepen pro-actively its own engagement 
              with Africa. Given Africa's needs and India's capabilities as well 
              as track record, cooperation between the two should be expanded 
              much further and faster. This would be the key challenge for the 
              second India-Africa Forum Summit to be held in 2011. 
  
              
                
              
              (The author served as 
              India's High Commissioner to Kenya and later to Lesotho and South 
              Africa. He can be reached at rajivbhatia@airtelmail.in) 
              
                
              
                
              
                
              
                
              
                
               |