| 
              
               
              New Delhi: The Delhi 
              Development Authority (DDA) Friday told the Delhi High Court that 
              it had complied with its orders for demolishing a mosque built 
              illegally on public land in Jangpura in south Delhi and had 
              reclaimed 350 sq metres of its land.  
               
              The DDA also pleaded with the court to drop its contempt 
              proceedings against it for the delay in carrying out its orders. 
               
              "In compliance with the directions of this court, a demolition 
              programme was fixed on Jan 12 in consultation with police 
              department and illegal/unauthorised structure that is a mosque 
              called 'Noor Masjid', its boundary wall and a newly constructed 
              tin shed were removed and about 350 square metres DDA land has 
              been reclaimed," the DDA told a bench headed by Justice G.S. 
              Sistani. 
               
              Facing a contempt threat from the high court, the DDA, after 
              several failed attempts, succeeded in demolishing the mosque built 
              35 years ago. The DDA also told the court that it had begun 
              fencing the land and constructing a boundary wall and had put up a 
              sign board saying that the land belongs to it. 
               
              Seeking dropping of the contempt proceedings, which were initiated 
              by the High Court for non-compliance of its earlier order, the 
              agency also tendered "an unqualified apology" for its failure to 
              reclaim the land earlier. 
               
              "It has the greatest respect for the court ...the respondent (DDA) 
              submits that its has not violated the judgement/order of this 
              court," the DDA said in its affidavit. 
               
              It also submitted its compliance report to the high court's order 
              for reclaiming encroached public land, annexing it with 
              photographs taken after the demolition of the mosque at Jangpura . 
               
              The court had in 2006 issued contempt notice to the DDA on a 
              petition of Jangpura Residents' Welfare Association (RWA), 
              represented by advocate R.K. Saini, alleging that its direction to 
              demolish the illegal structure had not been complied with. 
               
              Meanwhile, the court, on an assurance by the authorities, disposed 
              of the petition of RWA in 2008. "The matter was then referred to 
              Delhi government's religious committee which gave its approval for 
              demolishing the structure in Oct 2009, and the case was then 
              forwarded to Delhi Lt Governor Tejendra Khanna, who gave his nod 
              soon after," said Saini, the lawyer for the RWA. 
               
              In 2010, DDA tried demolishing the mosque six times, but was 
              unable to do so due to lack of adequate police protection. 
               
              Frustrated with the lack of action, the RWA again moved the court 
              in October 2010. The high court then issued a contempt notice 
              against Khanna, DDA vice-chairman and the commissioner (Land and 
              Management) and asked them to submit a compliance report within 
              four weeks. 
               
              Taking the DDA's affidavit against the contempt petition on 
              record, Justice Sistani fixed the matter for further hearing on 
              March 1, 2011. 
               
              Meanwhile, during the day, Delhi Wakf Board (DWB) approached a 
              larger bench of the Delhi High court seeking modification of its 
              earlier order to the DDA to demolish the mosque allegedly built on 
              encroached land. 
               
              "How can we set aside the order by entertaining your writ 
              petition. If we allow you (DWB) to argue and something else is 
              found then we will impose a heavy cost of Rs.one lakh on you 
              because you are a statutory body," Chief Justice Dipak Misra and 
              Sanjiv Khanna said. 
               
              Taking serious note of the petition, the bench said that the right 
              forum was the Wakf Tribunal and not the court. 
               
              "How can the order of a division bench be set aside by another and 
              moreover, the writ petition was not filed under the Constitution 
              of India," the court remarked, while allowing the petitioner to 
              withdraw the plea. 
               
              "The petition is permitted to be withdrawn," it said. 
               
              A DWB official told IANS that the board will file a fresh petition 
              before the court again next week. 
              
                
              
                
              
                
              
                
              
                
              
                
               |