[The panel comprising former Supreme Court judge FM Kalifulla, Sri Sri Ravishankar and senior advocate Sriram Panchu started consultations in March to explore an amicable settlement. (Photo: IANS/Twitter)]
New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Friday ordered day-to-day hearing on the Ayodhya dispute from August 6 as a committee appointed to mediate the vexed issue failed to reach any conclusion.
In a packed courtroom, a Constitution bench headed by Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi said: "The mediation has not resulted in a final settlement of the dispute. Therefore, the court will start the day-to-day hearing from August 6."
Reports said that the three-member panel appointed by the Supreme Court to consult with various groups and discuss a solution to the dispute "did its best to arrive at a consensus", but "some parties" did not agree to the mediation.
The panel comprising former Supreme Court judge FM Kalifulla, Sri Sri Ravishankar and senior advocate Sriram Panchu started consultations in March to explore an amicable settlement.
Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan, who represents a Muslim litigant, said his client opposed BJP MP Subramanian Swamy's writ petition emphasizing speeding up the trial.
Dhavan sought a firm reply from the judges on the fate of this writ. The court replied: "We will see to it."
Dhavan said he would probably require 20 days to complete the arguments on the matter and appealed to the court that the length of his argument should not be cut. The court replied: "We will see to it."
The Constitution bench refused to defer hearing, saying it would deal with Dhavan's objections during the hearing.
The historic mosque believed to be built by Mir Baqi, one of the commanders of Mughal Emperor Babur, was thrown into a controversy as a result of India's communal politics. It was at last demolished in broad daylight on December 06, 1992 by Hindu extremists in the presence of top RSS, BJP, VHP, Bajrang Dal and other right wing groups' top leadership.
Following a lenghty judicial battle, the Allahabad High Court had in a verdict pronounced in 2010 equally divided the 2.77 acres of land between Ram Lalla, Sunni Wakf Board and Nirmohi Akhara. Hindus and Muslims however have both challenged the HC verdict in the Supreme Court hearing of which will start from today.
For all the latest News, Opinions and Views, download ummid.com App.
Select Language To Read in Urdu, Hindi, Marathi or Arabic.
'Tax Terrorism' Severely Hurting India's Economic Growth
AMU alumnus, once working as cleaner, wins Young Entrepreneur Award in Australia
Hajj 2019: 130-yr-old Indonesian pilgrim arrives in Makkah to a warm welcome
Not once while in Delhi have I seen the 'dard' of Kashmir and its people: Karan Singh
Also Read
Countdown on for end of Article 35A, Modi govt moves more troops in Kashmir
Triple Talaq in 'instalments': Actor's husband discovers new method to dissolve marriage
Mumbai: Lokhandwala Muslims do this to avoid offering Namaz on roads
Adobe integrates "Sign" feature in Acrobat Reader
Afghanistan: US, Taliban likely to announce peace accord on August 1
The Policy Direction of Cryptocurrency Regulation in Emerging Economies
Miyah Poetry: How Do Besieged Communities Respond?