New Delhi: The Supreme Court on Monday agreed to hear after its winter break a plea challenging practices of polygamy and "nikah halala", the process for a woman who wants to remarry her divorced husband, among some of the Muslim sects .
A bench, headed by Chief Justice S.A. Bobde and comprising Justices B.R. Gavai and Surya Kant, declined to list the matter for urgent hearing, but agreed to examine the plea in January 2020 after the winter break.
Advocate and BJP leader Ashwini Upadhyay mentioned the plea seeking directions declaring polygamy and nikah halala as unconstitutional and illegal. Querying the petitioners on the urgency to list the matter, Chief Justice Bobde said: "What is the urgency in the matter... aren't these religious customs being followed for several hundred years?"
While the practice of polygamy is outlawed in the country, exemption is provided to the Muslim community under the Muslim Personal Law (Shariat) Application Act, 1937, which paves the way for implementation of personal law in matters connected with marriage.
Similarly, nikah halala is also permitted. However, this practice in itself does not have any basis in the Islamic Shariah. Yet it is practiced by some of the Muslim sects, especially those belonging to Hanafi school of thought.
The bench queried the counsel on the nature of these religious practices and how do they make up a case for urgent hearing.
The counsel explained the bench that polygamy allows a Muslim man to have four wives, and under nikah halala, a Muslim woman, who intends to re-marry her husband after divorce, would have to marry another person and get divorce after consummating the marriage with the second person. Upadhyay insisted that these practices violate human rights.
"Petitioner is filing this petition under Article 32 of the Constitution seeking a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus to declare polygamy and nikah halala, practised in Muslim community, illegal and unconstitutional for being violative of Articles 14, 15, 21 and 25 of the Constitution," he said in his plea.
In July 2018, the top court had referred the matter to a Constitution bench, which is seized of similar petitions. The court had tagged Upadhyay's plea with a petition filed by a petitioner names Farzana.
In August 2017, the top court banned instant "Triple Talaq" among Sunni Muslims, and in March 2018, referred, to a larger bench, the batch of pleas seeking to examine the constitutional validity of polygamy and nikah halala.
Later the Indian Parliament enacted a law criminalising Triple Talaq.
For all the latest News, Opinions and Views, download ummid.com App.
Select Language To Read in Urdu, Hindi, Marathi or Arabic.
'No sympathy only action': Politicians barred from gang-rape, murder victim's house
Also Read
"Hang Rapists": Twitterati vent anger over Hyderabad rape-murder
Ram Temple: The Original Game Plan
Sena-NCP-Cong Maha Vikas Aghadi Takes Charge: CMP Key Points
Uddhav Thackeray takes oath as Maharashtra Chief Minister
"Rarely Seen": Ex-Finance Secretary on GDP slipping down to 4.5 pc
India’s GDP growth slips to slowest in more than six years
Why Indian Economy is slowing down: Manmohan Singh explains
Asia's Top 500 Universities: 165 of China, 101 of India, 87 of Japan in QS ranking 2020
Modi govt's 'Education Reforms' are taken from Birla-Ambani report
JNUSU: No decision yet on boycotting exams
Jio, Vodafone, Airtel announce new tariff plans "to cover losses"
At Airbnb, get 3000 unique recipes, chance to study with experts
Why Delhi's food scene is changing: Historian-turned chef explains
GST collection up 6% in November 2019: Ministry
'Tools To Divide The Society': Chorus against NRC, CAB becomes louder
"Flawed, Divisive": Leading English Daily on Amit Shah's NRC