New Delhi: A Hindu organisation has moved the Supreme Court to challenge a provision of a 1991 law that provides for maintaining the "religious character" of holy structures as existed on August 15, 1947, in order to reclaim disputed religious sites through litigation, other than Babri Masjid in Ayodhya.
The PIL filed by 'Vishwa Bhadra Pujari Purohit Mahasangh' sought court directions to declare Section 4 of the 1991 Act as ultra vires and unconstitutional.
The petitioner's challenge to Section 4 of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991, gains significance in the case of Kashi and Mathura where two mosques stand. The law does not allow the conversion of a temple into a mosque and vice versa.
The plea contended that the Act has barred the right and remedy against encroachment made on religious property of Hindus by exercise of power by followers of another faith.
"The result is that Hindu devotees cannot raise their grievance by instituting any suit in a civil court or invoke the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution against high-handedness and will not be able to restore back the religious character of Hindu endowments, temples, mutts etc from hoodlums if they had encroached upon such property before August 15, 1947 and such illegal and barbarian act will continue in perpetuity," said the petition.
"The Parliament while enacting the Act has excluded the property in dispute at Ayodhya for which Hindu have been fighting.... The top court in November 2019, through a unanimous 5-0 verdict, had granted the disputed land in Ayodhya for the construction of the Ram temple, and ordered that a five-acre plot must be found for construction of a mosque.
The petitioners claim that the Act infringes the right of worship of Hindus guaranteed by Article 25 of the Constitution. "Deprives the right of Hindu community under Article 26 from maintaining and managing the religious properties belonging to deity usurped by members of the other community. Takes away the remedy of Hindus to take back the places of worship and property attached thereto through court, which originally belong to a deity, and worship is being continuously performed thereat by devotees in a number of way," it averred.
The petitioners urged the Supreme Court to declare Section 4 of Act of 1991 as ultra vires to Article 14, 15(1), 25 and 26 of the Constitution and consequently void.
For all the latest News, Opinions and Views, download ummid.com App.
Select Language To Read in Urdu, Hindi, Marathi or Arabic.
Rahul compares Hindu-Muslim divide in India with Afro-American acrimony in US
Serious discrepancies in NIRF Ranking 2020: Aligarh Muslim University
Also Read
Jamia, AMU among Top 50 universities in India: QS World Rankings
NIRF Ranking 2020: Jamia Millia in India's top 10 varsities despite protests, riots
Once Covid-19 free, Goa now has 463 Coronavirus cases
Laila Ali, Hatika Zafar in Himachal board Class 10 Toppers List 2020
Ahmedabad now has over 15K Covid-19 cases, Gujarat tally tops 21.5K
GST Council halves interest rate on late filing of GSTR-3B returns for small businesses
Migrants now take centre stage in Bihar Assembly Elections 2020
India's First Feature Film on Rohingyas
With 2,043 new cases, Iran re-emerges as worst Covid-19 hit country in Mideast
Now students urge govt to postpone JEE, NEET
#StudentLivesMatter trends on Twitter as universities prepare for Final Year Exams