| 
            Stable India in Shaky South Asia a relief 
            for US.  This is one of the headlines finding prominent space in a 
            section of the media. There is no doubt that the result of the 
            general election has come as a relief to the millions in the country 
            and the Indians living abroad. However at the time when the country 
            is yet to see the formation of the new government in its place, a 
            section in the media is busy circulating the notion that the result 
            has also brought cheers world over specially the United States. The 
            basis of these reports ironically is the customary congratulatory 
            messages that usually world leaders exchange after every election or 
            regime change in a country. It is to be kept in mind that the response of 
            the world leaders would have been the same had the results of the 
            general election in India been the opposite of what we are seeing today.   
            Hence reading too much in such 
            congratulatory messages is like living in a fool’s paradise. It’s 
            more ironic when it comes from senior journalists associated with 
            reputed newspapers. It’s been becoming customary for a section in 
            the media to come out with such kind of reports after every event in 
            our country perhaps to please their masters abroad instead of 
            analyzing with a deeper look vis-à-vis the world events.   
            President Obama no doubt is a pleasant 
            change in United States. But what kind of change he would be able to 
            bring to his foreign policy is yet to be seen. In fact some 
            analysts, looking at few initiatives taken by Obama during past 
            hundred days in the office, fear that he would be towing the same 
            line as his predecessors. If their apprehensions are true, it asks 
            we Indians for utmost caution. For the US foreign policy is marred 
            with instances wherein it played instrumental roles in destabilising 
            the sovereign countries and the rulers who refused to fall in line.
               
            That the ongoing violence in the 
            Middle East and instability threatening Pakistan and daily bloodshed 
            in Afghanistan and Iraq are the recent examples of the dangerous US 
            foreign policy is not a secret anymore. It is also known to the 
            world that the day Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in 1991, former US
            Defence Secretary Ronald Rumsfeld 
            was reportedly present in Iraq and it was only after assurances from 
            him that Saddam gave marching order to his military. This has now 
            been established for certain that the invasion of Kuwait by Saddam 
            Hussein in 1991 was part of the larger US game-plan to destabilize 
            the whole region. If the move was to safeguard Israel’s interests or 
            was to control over the Middle East oil fields, is still debated. 
            However one thing is certain. If the innocent lives are at stake in 
            the Middle East, the US foreign policy has played a key role into 
            this.   
            As for South Asia, there are reports 
            and analysis ample in numbers to establish how US used Osama bin 
            Laden and Taliban first to destabilize and then disintegrate former 
            USSR. And now reportedly it is using to the same forces to subvert 
            not only Pakistan but whole of the region. The admission by none 
            other than US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that they are 
            paying the price for their own misdoings in Afghanistan and Pakistan 
            has only vindicated the notion.   
            Those who always eye for the proximity 
            with United States should not forget what fate the kinds of Saddams 
            and Zia-ul-Haques, and also Osamas, once regarded as the trusted US 
            allies and lieutenants, have met with. Against this backdrop, 
            doesn’t the Indian Foreign policy need a thorough assessment?   
            President Obama no doubt is signaling 
            new, pleasant and more accommodating amendments in his policies. If 
            they survive till they are implemented is yet to be seen. For it is 
            widely believed that in US, the presidents change not their foreign 
            policies. However like the world we too are optimistic. For sooner 
            the United States changes its foreign policy better is for the 
            world. Till then we have to be cautious.  This is also needed 
            because India as an emerging world leader owes it to the South Asian 
            countries to play a pivotal role for building a peaceful and strong 
            South Asia. India has always led the world. Suggesting it to become 
            a toady hanger-on of US may serve the purpose for a section in the 
            country. But in the longer run, it is dangerous not only for the 
            country but also for whole of the South Asia.   
            Interestingly till yesterday everyone 
            of us, including the Congress and UPA, was worried of the post poll 
            scenario that dreadfully suggested a fractured mandate. The Indian 
            voters cleverly kept their cards close to their chests. It was only 
            after the results that we came to know what a pleasant surprise they 
            had in store for all of us. By giving a verdict for a stable India 
            clearly suggests that the Indian voters have now grown matured. Can 
            one expect the same from our responsible journalists?       |