| 
            
            Mumbai/Malegaon:  
            The Central Bureau of Investigation 
            (CBI), three years after it took over the probe in the 2006 Malegaon 
            blasts, has said that it does not have evidence against those 
            arrested in the case.  
              
            The CBI has not filed a chargesheet or 
            report before the special court because it has no evidence, Public 
            prosecutor D.N. Salvi informed the Bombay High Court (HC) on 
            November, 16 yesterday.   
            Salvi's reply in the High Court (HC) 
            came during the hearing of the petition filed by Mohd. Zahid, Noorul 
            Huda and Shabbir Masihulla - three of the nine accused in jail since 
            2006. 
              
            The reply prompted the judges to 
            direct the Maharashtra 
            government to give explanations as to why the investigations of 
            September 2006 Malegaon blast were handed over to the Central Bureau 
            of Investigation (CBI). 
              
            Malegaon, the textile town in North 
            Maharashtra was attacked by terrorists 
            in September 2006. The blasts 
            that had taken place outside and near a mosque had killed more than 
            30 people and injured over 300, all of them Muslims. The 
            investigating agencies alleged the involvement of the Muslim youths 
            belonging to SIMI into the incident.  
              
            Following the persistent demand from 
            the town that by and large believed the arrested youths are 
            innocent, the government handed the investigations to CBI. 
              
            The High Court 
            during the hearing on November 17, 2009 yesterday said that 
            the cause for the transfer of investigations after the charge sheet 
            was filed needs to be examined. 
              
            "Why the case was handed over to the 
            CBI after ATS filed its chargesheet. Was it because the Government 
            doesn't have faith in its own investigating team?", Justice Patil 
            asked. 
              
            When Public Prosecutor said it was 
            because of the public outcry that the investigation was handed over 
            to the CBI, it infuriated the bench. 
              
            "Then we should release these accused 
            on bail too. There is public outcry," said Justice Patel. "Who 
            cried? State is going to decide on public outcry or based on 
            facts?", he asked.   
            ATS had arrested nine Muslim youths 
            for conspiring the blast. Abrar Ahmed one of these nine nine accused 
            became approver in the case. Abrar, however, turned hostile later on 
            and filed an affidavit saying he was lured and pressurized to become 
            an approver.
            
            Abrar in his affidavit has also leveled serious charges against 
            the investigating officers.   
            The petitioners' advocate Amin Solkar 
            argued that according to Abrar's affidavit those arrested in the 
            September 29, 2008 blast in Malegaon had also carried out the 2006 
            blasts.   
            "There are serious allegations against 
            the investigating officers, then Superintendent of Police Rajvardhan 
            and ATS chief K.P. Raghuvanshi which need to be looked into," said 
            Solkar.   
            Solkar said the ATS filed the 
            chargesheet a day after the government had handed over the probe to 
            the CBI.    
            Police, however, maintained that the 
            chargesheet was filed before the CBI took over the probe. The HC has 
            asked the government to clarify this too. 
              
            The petitioners 
            has also sought 
            to investigate into the manner in which the inquiry was conducted in 
            the case.  
              
            The High Court has 
            asked the 
            state 
            government  to file an affidavit in this 
            regard within two weeks. 
              
              
              
              
              
              
              |