After facing humiliations first by the
Rahul Gandhi’s startling Mumbai visit and the latest by the
Mumbaikars who defying its dictates poured out in a large number to
watch Shah Rukh Khan starrer My Name is Khan, the communal forces in
India were
searching hideouts till yesterday. Not finding ways to counter the
impact of these not so-common developments, they were left with no
option but to use Sena mouthpiece Saamna
to spew venom against Mrs. Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi, Ashok Chavan,
and using the name of Shah Rukh Khan, the entire Muslim community in
India.
It is then that the terrorists attacked
German Bakery in Pune. The communal forces, clearly on
back-foot till the heinous crime that took 9 innocent lives besides
injuring more than 50, came in the attacking mood once again. And
with them is the entire Saffron brigade that till recently was like
phirte hai meer khwar koi puchta nahi. No one can support the
terrorist activities especially when national security and innocent
lives are at stake. But after the Pune blast, the communal
forces are taking on the ruling Congress and the
alliance government as if they are the only people left in the
country who care for the security and integrity of India.
However, the question that comes to minds is the one raised, besides many others, by Congress General
Secretary Digvijay Singh on more than one occasion in the past.
While wondering over such coincidences, he has reportedly asked, why
terrorists strike whenever the communal forces are in trouble.
One specially remembers the Mumbai train blasts. The incident
occurred on Tuesday, July 11, 2006 in the evening. Two days before
on July 09, 2006, Bal Thackeray’s deceased wife Meenatai Thackeray’s
bust was smeared with mud. As it normally happens, blaming the
Muslims of defiling the statute, Sainiks went on the rampage
in Mumbai and other cities including
Thane, Panvel, Pune, Nashik and Nagpur.
The Time of
India reported the incident the following day: ‘At Shivaji Park, a
Volvo bus was set on fire; at Thane, another of Sena’s strongholds,
the McDonald’s outlet and Big Bazaar were stoned; in Andheri, a
mosque was targeted and in the ensuing clashes, a policeman was
seriously injured. With Sunday shopping and leisure activity brought
to a halt, the retail and hospitality sectors in the city took a Rs
25 crore hit. Pubs and restaurants awaiting guests for the World Cup
Soccer final expected a weak turnout.’ (The Times of India, Mumbai
July 10, 2006)
“Sainiks will
not keep quiet when policemen are burnt in Bhiwandi and Maasaheb (Meenatai’s)
statue is desecrated,” The Time of India, Mumbai quoted Uddhav
Thackeray the same day even as then Chief Minister Maharashtra
Vilasrao Deshmukh sought to play down the charge that the riots in
Bhiwandi and the desecration of the statue at Shivaji Park were
linked, by terming them as two separate incidents.
The
desecration incident the following day turned out even more embarrassing for
the communal forces when Revenue Minister and a former Sainik,
Narayan Rane openly alleged that the Sena itself had conspired the
desecration as the leadership felt ‘the party’s existence is being
threatened.’ In a double blow to them, Home Minister RR Patil in
the state legislative assembly hinted at something of similar in
nature.
The Time of
India reported the entire issue in these words: ‘It was a double
blow for the Shiv Sena. On Monday, not only was the party openly
accused by revenue minister Narayan Rane of having plotted the
desecration of the Meenatai Thackeray statue at Shivaji Park, it had
to face similar censure from R R Patil as well. The deputy CM, who
also holds the home portfolio, dropped hints in the state
legislative assembly, saying that the Sena would be embarrassed if
he began revealing parts of the investigation into the desecration
incident.’ (The Times of India, Mumbai July 11, 2006)
After these
developments, the communal forces found themselves in the same
catch-22 situation as they were few days before. However, the series
of blasts that occurred in Mumbai suburban trains in the evening on
July 11, 2006 provided them an opportunity to come out of the
vicious circle in the manner exactly similar to what we have seen in
the previous week.
Certainly,
we do not blame anyone. Nor have we any sympathy towards the
terrorists who are behind these attacks. But when coincidences
occur frequently questions come into minds. Surprisingly, the answer to
this question didn't come even after the conspiracy of bomb
blasts hatched by the militant Hindu outfits got unearthed first by
the slain ATS chief Hemant Karkare and recently after the failed
attempt to target the deewali eve party in Goa.
Interestingly, the media and the investigating agencies try hard to
make us believe that the terrorists who are playing with innocent
lives most of the time belong to Indian Mujahideen, Lashakar-e-Taiba,
SIMI, HUJI and other similar names claiming to be working for some
‘Muslim cause’ best known only to them. However, looking deeper into
the terror attacks and the trauma that these attacks bring along for
the Indian Muslims, one just fails to realize for whose cause these
‘Jihadis’ are actually for.
Footnote:
Senior
Journalist working with CNN-IBN Sagarika Ghose tweets:
Wonder which
groups gain the most from communal polarisation and blasts...Blasts
which leave everyone guessing…
Pune blasts:
Who is the culprit? Indian Mujahideen? Sanatan Sanstha? Only
investigations will reveal. Rest all speculation…
|