More on Ummid: International l National l Regional l Politics l Business l Religion l History l Culture l Education
'Israel, result of countries' identities affected during world war I & II'
MANUU to host National Conference on exclusionary perspectives.....
Thousands flock to “Blockbuster” Muslim Heritage Exhibition: More than 15,000 people have rushed to visit a recently opened exhibition at London’s Science Museum. Launched .....Read Full
'Reservation is the right of Muslims'
says M.J. Akbar, urged the Muslims to stop begging the Government: When other backward ....Read Full
Should India talk to Pakistan? Why not, say experts: It is necessary for India to talk to Pakistan and raise its concerns with the civilian government there because that very ....Read Full
Doha Debate in Delhi: 62% elites think Muslims get a fair deal in India: 62.1% of around 300 people who participated in the Doha Debate on February 15, 2010 at St .....Read Full
Sibal, Khurshid pat Jamia students for spirit of peace: Human Resource Development (HRD) Minister Kapil Sibal and Minority Affairs Minister Salman Khurshid Tuesday congratulated students from ....Read Full
Pune Blast: Coincidence again?: After facing humiliations first by the Rahul Gandhi’s startling Mumbai visit and the latest by the Mumbaikars who defying its dictates .....Read Full
Maha Govt. announces Fee Reimbursement Scheme for minority students: In yet another important attempt to reach to the minorities, the Government of Maharashtra has announced Fee Reimbursement...Read Full
How political ambitions of Pakistan turned paradise called Azad Kashmir into living hell: After its formation, Pakistan had great political expectations from the Azad Kashmir....Read Full
Hindus, Muslims to celebrate Prophet's birth anniversary: People from all communities gathered here Sunday afternoon to resolve to jointly celebrate Prophet Mohammed's ....Read Full
Google Buzz racing against time to fix biggest privacy breach in its history: Google’s Buzz is facing flak from critics over what they have dubbed as the biggest....Read Full
An Indian now owns East India Company: Creating a new brand for India: With just around a month to go for the re-launch of the East India Company - the world’s .....Read Full
Habibullah stays as CIC, tells Omar can't take RTI post: Chief Information Commissioner (CIC) Wajahat Habibullah, who resigned last year to head the Jammu and Kashmir State Information ....Read Full
Do Muslims get a fair deal in India?
Thursday, February 18, 2010 03:07:16 PM, Andrew Buncombe
Moderator Tim Sebastian and the Doha Debates traveled from Doha, Qatar to host a debate at St. Stephen's College in Delhi, India on February 15, 2010. The motion of the debate was: This house believes Muslims aren't getting a fair deal in India
(Photo: Anne Sherwood)
Doha Debate in Delhi: 62% elites think Muslims get a fair deal in India: 62.1% of around 300 people who participated in the Doha Debate on February 15, 2010 at St. Stephan College in New Delhi voted against .....Read Full
'This House believes Muslims are not getting a fair deal in India'
Inquilab 1857 to Sacchar Report: Nothing changed for the Indian Muslims
2009: A year of commissions, little actions for Indian Muslims
The side of Indian Muslims Sachar Committee missed in its Report
Minorities’ welfare and UPA government initiatives : An analysis
Last night I was in the audience for the filming of the latest of the Doha Debates, the series of discussions headed by Tim Sebastian and broadcast by BBC World News. Held within the quite solace of St Stephen's College, one of the most prestigious colleges within Delhi University, the debates were breaking new ground by holding their first event in Asia.
I had been in two minds whether to go, mainly because I thought the issue being discussed, "This house believes that Muslims are not getting a fair deal in India", seems to be so overwhelmingly obvious. Ever since the government-appointed Sachar Committee reported in 2006 that Muslims in India had less access to education, government jobs and survived on lower incomes than average, it seemed the issue was settled. Of course, there are plenty of Muslims who reach the heights in India, from politicians through to Bollywood stars such as Shah Rukh Khan, but taken as a whole it would be hard to argue that Muslims did not suffer discrimination.
Indeed, when the debate got started it seemed everyone taking part agreed on this issue, including the two participants challenging the motion. The veteran journalist MJ Akbar, who has spent much of his career highlighting discrimination in India, was one of the two taking on this task and even he admitted "you cannot say that Muslims get an entirely fair deal". Sachin Pilot, a young government minister, (he is also the son of a former Congress minister) and an alumni of St Stephen's, also admitted things were not perfect. Yet he argued that there were many elements within Indian society that suffered and it was not that Muslims suffered particular discrimination.
Against this, Seema Mustafa, a journalist and political commentator, said the government had done little for Muslims who had been especially victimised by security forces since the 9/11 attacks. Teesta Setalvad, a prominent civil rights activist, claimed that Muslims were being excluded from the "elite political and economic leadership of India". "The Muslim today lives in a segregated class leading to ghettoisation and a consequently very dangerous situation. Above all, Muslim women are discriminated against to make sure a credible leadership does not emerge," she said.
They also mentioned the Indian establishment's refusal to properly bring to justice those responsible for attacks on Muslims, be it the destruction of the Babri Masjid of the appalling misnamed Gujarat "riots" in which hundreds of Muslims were brutally murdered in a systematic operation assisted by elements within the local government, headed by the right-wing nationalist Narendra Modi, a man who has been tipped as a possible future leader of the country.
In fact, so obvious to me was the outcome of the debate, that I left early. I was rather surprised therefore to wake up and discover that the vote had gone the other way. The vote by the students of the college, alumni of which account for six current government ministers, found that 63 per cent opposed the motion while only 37 agreed.
So what to make of this? In a situation where the statistics apparently prove one thing, how could a group of such young smart people have voted the other way. Were they really taken in by Sachin Pilot's disingenuous argument that "everyone in India has an equal opportunity" or what it simply that was this was what they wanted to believe (and who would not wish for such a situation). I couldn't help thinking there was something of a cycle here: if the sorts of people that get to become government ministers in India are drawn from educational establishments seemingly so blind to the obvious pitfalls of their society then maybe that's why nothing get's changed. And yes, one could say the same thing about plenty of other countries all around the world.
Courtesy: The Independents, UK
Andrew Buncombe, The Independent's Asia Correspondent is based in Delhi. His dominion ranges over India, Pakistan, Burma, Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, occasionally parts of South East Asia and - or at least he is hoping - The Maldives.
Comment on this article
Ummid.com: Home | Contact Us | Disclaimer | Terms of Use | About Us | Feedback
Ummid Business: Advertise with us | Careers | Link Exchange
Ummid.com is part of Awaz Multimedia & Publications providing World News, News Analysis and Feature Articles on Education, Health. Politics, Technology, Sports, Entertainment, Industry etc. The articles or the views displayed on this website are for public information and in no way describe the editorial views. The users are entitled to use this site subject to the terms and condition mentioned.